CCCrypto Crow · Cardano dRep

← The Ledger

Vote record

tx 409239633e3232560160ad5766619598ac4385e2c26b09562a287d94f88c2c08

One transaction — 6 vote certificates


YES

Withdraw ₳605,000 for A free Native Asset CDN for Cardano Developers

Epoche572
Cast2025-07-24
Requested605K ₳
OutcomeENACTED

This treasury withdrawal funds **A free Native Asset CDN for Cardano Developers** which will provide the following services: Building reliable infrastructure to display Cardano native assets (NFTs &FTs) efficiently, at scale, can cost upwards of $100,000 and take 9+ months of development effort. **We propose to deliver a free Native Asset Content Delivery Network (CDN) for Cardano, by making our existing NFTCDN services free to use for anyone building on Cardano**. NFTCDN has been operating since 2022 and provides fast, reliable and resilient multimedia and metadata delivery through a globally distributed CDN, enabling projects to display native assets effortlessly. By removing technical and financial barriers, NFTCDN allows developers to focus on product innovation and growth, accelerate time-to-market, and promotes wider adoption and implementation of native assets within apps across the Cardano ecosystem. This Treasury Withdrawal is submitted by Intersect on behalf of the vendor. The following sections; Abstract, Motivation, Rationale and Vendor Profile have been sourced from the approved proposal submitted by the Vendor as part of the Intersect budget process. This treasury withdrawal funds one of 39 proposals to give effect to the approved budget info action for ₳275,269,340, administered by Intersect via gov_action1u9x73kwufaxa70lfy59g4ynwyrcsaxdcd0gxzzmh67s9fxq4j8hqqk2phgh. The information provided herein is intended to fulfill the spirit of the constitutional requirement for a treasury withdrawal info action by also providing the details of the proposed solution, alignment to the budget, and amount to be withdrawn from the Cardano Treasury.

Reasoning

Written after the vote was cast

What this asks for, and from whom

605,000 ADA for a free native asset CDN for Cardano.

What would have to be true for this to be a good use of treasury funds

Shared infrastructure that every wallet, marketplace, and explorer can use is a textbook public good. Nobody funds it privately because nobody can charge for it, which is exactly why a treasury should.

What specifically concerns me

This was part of the 2025 Intersect budget slate, which I voted as a slate. I am saying that plainly rather than pretending each line got its own week of deliberation. The slate came through a community budget process with a support threshold before it ever reached the chain, and my judgment was that the process outcome deserved backing in Cardano's first real treasury cycle. At this size and in this category, my concerns are minimal.

What I am asking of the proposer if this passes

It was enacted. Keep it free and keep it maintained. Public infrastructure that quietly develops a paywall later is the failure mode to avoid here.


YES

Withdraw ₳600,000 for Complete Web3 developer stack to make Cardano the smart...

Epoche572
Cast2025-07-24
Requested600K ₳
OutcomeENACTED

This treasury withdrawal funds **Complete Web3 developer stack to make Cardano the smart contract layer for Bitcoin** which will provide the following services: Maestro proposes a comprehensive infrastructure solution that positions Cardano as Bitcoin's primary smart contract and DeFi execution layer. Leveraging Maestro's enterprise-grade UTXO infrastructure platform, this integration will bridge Bitcoin's substantial liquidity and large user base directly into the Cardano ecosystem. Maestro's solution will provide a complete suite of developer-friendly infrastructure services and tools, including: Blockchain Indexer: For real-time blockchain data querying and insights. - Blockchain Indexer: For real-time blockchain data querying and insights. - Mempool Monitoring: Enabling developers to detect transactions and on-chain events instantly, even before they are confirmed. - Event Notification System: Allowing instant webhook alerts for on-chain activities, significantly enhancing the responsiveness of dApps. - Wallet Manager: Facilitating secure, efficient wallet management, address derivation, and user transaction tracking. These tools significantly improve the developer experience, dramatically reducing complexity and integration overhead. By abstracting away blockchain complexities, Maestro empowers developers to quickly build and deploy advanced DeFi applications, wallets, and Layer-2 integrations, directly utilizing Bitcoin liquidity. This Treasury Withdrawal is submitted by Intersect on behalf of the vendor. The following sections; Abstract, Motivation, Rationale and Vendor Profile have been sourced from the approved proposal submitted by the Vendor as part of the Intersect budget process. This treasury withdrawal funds one of 39 proposals to give effect to the approved budget info action for ₳275,269,340, administered by Intersect via gov_action1u9x73kwufaxa70lfy59g4ynwyrcsaxdcd0gxzzmh67s9fxq4j8hqqk2phgh. The information provided herein is intended to fulfill the spirit of the constitutional requirement for a treasury withdrawal info action by also providing the details of the proposed solution, alignment to the budget, and amount to be withdrawn from the Cardano Treasury.

Reasoning

Written after the vote was cast

What this asks for, and from whom

600,000 ADA for a complete Web3 developer stack for Cardano.

What would have to be true for this to be a good use of treasury funds

Developers arriving from other chains expect a familiar stack. Every missing piece is a reason to build somewhere else, and Cardano loses builders to friction more than to disagreement.

What specifically concerns me

This was part of the 2025 Intersect budget slate, which I voted as a slate. I am saying that plainly rather than pretending each line got its own week of deliberation. The slate came through a community budget process with a support threshold before it ever reached the chain, and my judgment was that the process outcome deserved backing in Cardano's first real treasury cycle. On this item, my usual caution about tooling applies: stacks funded once and abandoned are worse than no stack, because developers build on them and get stranded.

What I am asking of the proposer if this passes

It was enacted. Publish adoption. A developer stack nobody adopts is a maintenance liability we will be asked to fund again next year.


YES

Withdraw ₳592,780 for Beyond Minimum Viable Governance: Iteratively Improvin....

Epoche572
Cast2025-07-24
Requested593K ₳
OutcomeENACTED

This treasury withdrawal funds **Beyond Minimum Viable Governance: Iteratively Improving on Cardano Voltaire** which will provide the following services: This initiative will establish a robust framework for evaluating and enhancing Cardano's governance system. We will identify and benchmark key governance metrics to assess the health, performance, and overall impact of our decentralized decision-making processes. The resulting 'State of Governance' report will provide a structured evaluation of participation, track vital Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), map the evolving governance ecosystem, and pinpoint specific areas for improvement. To ensure our findings are grounded in real-world experience, we will engage the Cardano community through various channels. These include virtual workshops, targeted surveys, and in-depth user interviews. By actively gathering and synthesizing community insights, we will gain a comprehensive understanding of the current state of governance. This will allow us to formulate actionable recommendations and pave the way for post-MVG (Minimum Viable Governance) evolution. Where appropriate, these recommendations will be developed into initial drafts of Cardano Problem Statements (CPSs) or Cardano Improvement Proposals (CIPs), directly reflecting the community's vision for a more robust and effective governance future. This Treasury Withdrawal is submitted by Intersect on behalf of the vendor. The following sections; Abstract, Motivation, Rationale and Vendor Profile have been sourced from the approved proposal submitted by the Vendor as part of the Intersect budget process. This treasury withdrawal funds one of 39 proposals to give effect to the approved budget info action for ₳275,269,340, administered by Intersect via gov_action1u9x73kwufaxa70lfy59g4ynwyrcsaxdcd0gxzzmh67s9fxq4j8hqqk2phgh. The information provided herein is intended to fulfill the spirit of the constitutional requirement for a treasury withdrawal info action by also providing the details of the proposed solution, alignment to the budget, and amount to be withdrawn from the Cardano Treasury.

Reasoning

Written after the vote was cast

What this asks for, and from whom

592,780 ADA for Beyond Minimum Viable Governance, work on Cardano's governance capability.

What would have to be true for this to be a good use of treasury funds

Governance was shipped to the public before this ecosystem was ready for it, which is my honest long-held view. Work that closes that readiness gap has real value.

What specifically concerns me

This was part of the 2025 Intersect budget slate, which I voted as a slate. I am saying that plainly rather than pretending each line got its own week of deliberation. The slate came through a community budget process with a support threshold before it ever reached the chain, and my judgment was that the process outcome deserved backing in Cardano's first real treasury cycle. My reservation on governance-about-governance spending generally: it can become an industry unto itself, funding people to study participation rather than creating any.

What I am asking of the proposer if this passes

It was enacted. Measure the outcome in participation, not publications. More Dreps voting, more delegators choosing actively. That is what beyond minimum viable actually means.


YES

Withdraw ₳3,126,000 for Ecosystem Exchange Listing and Market Making service...

Epoche572
Cast2025-07-24
Requested3.1M ₳
OutcomeENACTED

This treasury withdrawal funds **Ecosystem Exchange Listing and Market Making service pool** which will provide MMAAS (Market Making as a Service): Proposal Overview This proposal aims to address two core issues within the Cardano ecosystem: - Problem 1: No Cardano project currently has a top-tier market maker, with the exception of Snek and Iagon. - Problem 2: No Cardano Native Token (CNT) is listed on top-tier exchanges such as Binance, Bybit, Okex, Kraken and Coinbase. Objective We, at Flowdesk, are committed to solving these problems. Our goal is to act as a trustworthy partner in assisting Cardano Web 3.0 projects by providing essential services such as Market Making as-a-Service (MMAAS) and helping with exchange listings. Through these efforts, we aim to enhance the overall liquidity and market presence of Cardano projects. This Treasury Withdrawal is submitted by Intersect on behalf of the vendor. The following sections; Abstract, Motivation, Rationale and Vendor Profile have been sourced from the approved proposal submitted by the Vendor as part of the Intersect budget process. This treasury withdrawal funds one of 39 proposals to give effect to the approved budget info action for ₳275,269,340, administered by Intersect via gov_action1u9x73kwufaxa70lfy59g4ynwyrcsaxdcd0gxzzmh67s9fxq4j8hqqk2phgh. The information provided herein is intended to fulfill the spirit of the constitutional requirement for a treasury withdrawal info action by also providing the details of the proposed solution, alignment to the budget, and amount to be withdrawn from the Cardano Treasury.

Reasoning

Written after the vote was cast

What this asks for, and from whom

3,126,000 ADA for ecosystem exchange listing and market making support.

What would have to be true for this to be a good use of treasury funds

Market access and liquidity depth affect whether anyone can practically use Cardano assets. Thin books drive users to other chains regardless of technical merit.

What specifically concerns me

This was part of the 2025 Intersect budget slate, which I voted as a slate. I am saying that plainly rather than pretending each line got its own week of deliberation. The slate came through a community budget process with a support threshold before it ever reached the chain, and my judgment was that the process outcome deserved backing in Cardano's first real treasury cycle. Market making is also the least transparent category in any treasury, since terms are usually confidential and results are hard to attribute. That combination deserves scrutiny even when the spending is justified.

What I am asking of the proposer if this passes

It was enacted. Publish whatever the agreements permit: venues, depth achieved, spread improvements. Opaque spending erodes trust faster than no spending at all.


YES

Withdraw ₳314,800 for PyCardano administered by Intersect

Epoche572
Cast2025-07-24
Requested315K ₳
OutcomeENACTED

This treasury withdrawal funds **PyCardano** which will provide the following services: ​ PyCardano is a lightweight Python library that enables developers to interact seamlessly with the Cardano blockchain. It facilitates the creation and signing of transactions without reliance on external serialization tools, thereby simplifying the development process and broadening accessibility for Python developers. Given the dynamic nature of blockchain technology, particularly with Cardano's ongoing protocol upgrades and hard forks, it is imperative to maintain and update PyCardano to ensure continuous compatibility and functionality.​ This proposal aims to: Ensure Compatibility: Regularly update PyCardano to align with the latest Cardano ledger rules and protocol changes, including upcoming hard forks in 2025.​ Enhance Reliability: Promptly identify and resolve bugs within PyCardano to maintain a robust and dependable library for developers for 12 months since the proposal is funded.​ Foster Community Engagement: Collaborate with the Cardano developer community to gather feedback, address issues, and implement improvements effectively. This Treasury Withdrawal is submitted by Intersect on behalf of the vendor. The following sections; Abstract, Motivation, Rationale and Vendor Profile have been sourced from the approved proposal submitted by the Vendor as part of the Intersect budget process. This treasury withdrawal funds one of 39 proposals to give effect to the approved budget info action for ₳275,269,340, administered by Intersect via gov_action1u9x73kwufaxa70lfy59g4ynwyrcsaxdcd0gxzzmh67s9fxq4j8hqqk2phgh. The information provided herein is intended to fulfill the spirit of the constitutional requirement for a treasury withdrawal info action by also providing the details of the proposed solution, alignment to the budget, and amount to be withdrawn from the Cardano Treasury.

Reasoning

Written after the vote was cast

What this asks for, and from whom

314,800 ADA for PyCardano, administered by Intersect.

What would have to be true for this to be a good use of treasury funds

PyCardano is the Python library a lot of developers and researchers use to touch Cardano without writing Haskell. Maintaining language bindings is cheap, unglamorous, and disproportionately valuable.

What specifically concerns me

This was part of the 2025 Intersect budget slate, which I voted as a slate. I am saying that plainly rather than pretending each line got its own week of deliberation. The slate came through a community budget process with a support threshold before it ever reached the chain, and my judgment was that the process outcome deserved backing in Cardano's first real treasury cycle. At this size, nothing material.

What I am asking of the proposer if this passes

It was enacted. Track the ledger eras as they change so nobody's tooling breaks silently. That is the entire job and it is worth every ADA when it is done well.


YES

Withdraw ₳104,347 for MLabs Research towards Tooling for Elliptical Curves...

Epoche572
Cast2025-07-24
Requested104K ₳
OutcomeENACTED

This treasury withdrawal funds MLabs **Research towards Tooling for Elliptical Curves - GrumpleStiltSkin** which will provide the following services: GrumpleStiltSkin will deliver an open-source, parameterized elliptic curve and Galois field framework implemented in Plutarch. The goal is to allow smart contracts on Cardano to verify cryptographic proofs over customizable curves and fields. This will include: - Plutarch support for Galois field arithmetic - Plutarch support for elliptic curve arithmetic - A generic ZK verifier in Plutarch - A validation test suite over BLS12-381 - A composable YTxP-compatible Plutarch wrapper This tool empowers developers with on-chain cryptographic flexibility, expands Cardano's ZK application capabilities, and sets the stage for future innovations in privacy and authentication. Deliver a parameterized elliptic curve and finite field cryptography framework in Plutarch, enabling developers to build smart contracts that verify zero-knowledge proofs over arbitrary curves. This flexibility empowers privacy-focused dApps, improves composability, and advances Cardano's technical capabilities. It creates a foundation for a wide range of ZK-powered features while reducing duplication of effort across the ecosystem. This Treasury Withdrawal is submitted by Intersect on behalf of the vendor. The following sections; Abstract, Motivation, Rationale and Vendor Profile have been sourced from the approved proposal submitted by the Vendor as part of the Intersect budget process. This treasury withdrawal funds one of 39 proposals to give effect to the approved budget info action for ₳275,269,340, administered by Intersect via gov_action1u9x73kwufaxa70lfy59g4ynwyrcsaxdcd0gxzzmh67s9fxq4j8hqqk2phgh. The information provided herein is intended to fulfill the spirit of the constitutional requirement for a treasury withdrawal info action by also providing the details of the proposed solution, alignment to the budget, and amount to be withdrawn from the Cardano Treasury.

Reasoning

Written after the vote was cast

What this asks for, and from whom

104,347 ADA for MLabs research toward Cardano tooling.

What would have to be true for this to be a good use of treasury funds

Small research grants that feed directly into tooling used by production teams are among the most efficient spending in any budget.

What specifically concerns me

This was part of the 2025 Intersect budget slate, which I voted as a slate. I am saying that plainly rather than pretending each line got its own week of deliberation. The slate came through a community budget process with a support threshold before it ever reached the chain, and my judgment was that the process outcome deserved backing in Cardano's first real treasury cycle. Nothing specific at roughly a hundred thousand ADA.

What I am asking of the proposer if this passes

It was enacted. Ship the research into the tools. Research that stays in a document helps nobody build anything.